The Financial Reform Act: New Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection Is Established with Broad Rulemaking, Enforcement and Regulatory Authority

On June 30, 2010, the House of Representatives approved the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, or the Financial Reform Act, a comprehensive and expansive set of financial reforms widely thought to be the toughest changes to financial regulation in the United States since the Great Depression.  The Senate approved the Financial Reform Act on July 15, 2010 and President Obama signed it into law on July 21, 2010.  Among the key provisions of the Financial Reform Act is the creation of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, which will have authority over a wide range of participants in the consumer finance industry.  This Update highlights the salient features of the Financial Reform Act as it relates to the consumer finance industry.

Read more about the Bureau, including its rulemaking and enforcement authority, at the Perkins Coie News page:  http://www.perkinscoie.com/news/pubs_detail.aspx?op=updates&publication=2709

Financial Reform Bill Includes Provision Addressing Insurance Redlining

Although garnering relatively little attention to date, included in the Dodd-Frank Financial Reform bill is a provision (Section 502) creating the "Federal Insurance Office" (FIO).  The FIO is charged with, among other things, "monitor[ing] the extent to which traditionally underserved communities and consumers, minorities, and low- and moderate-income persons have access to affordable insurance products regarding all lines of insurance..."  The FIO has authority to "receive and collect data and information on and from the insurance industry and insurers" and to "analyze and disseminate data and information."  This data review component offers federal regulators an opportunity to analyze the information for potential insurance redlining similar to agency review of Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) data for lending discrimination.  Federal agencies (and class action plaintiffs' attorneys) have for many years  used HMDA to support investigations and lawsuits against lenders.  The creation of the FIO and the data review process may lead to similar results.

As professor Gregory D. Squires recently wrote in comparing the FIO's data review function to banking agency review of HMDA: 

This is the time for the federal government to finally collect from the insurance industry the kind of information it has long collected from mortgage lenders under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA). For more than three decades the Feds have collected information on the number and types of home loans most mortgage lenders have made in the nation's metropolitan areas along with the census tract or neighborhood in which the homes were located. HMDA has been modified so now lenders are required to disclose the race, gender, and income of all applicants, whether their application was approved or denied, and for certain high cost loans the interest rate on those loans.
 

 

President Signs Financial Reform Bill Including Increased Consumer Protections

On July 15, 2010 the U.S. Senate passed, and on July 21 the President signed, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.  Included in the new legislation are a number of provisions that will impact consumer lenders, and in particular, residential mortgage lenders:

  • Lenders Must Ensure a Borrower’s Ability to Repay.  Establishes federal minimum underwriting standards for mortgages, including a requirement that lenders consider borrowers ability to repay. (Section 1411) 
  • Prohibits Unfair Lending Practices.  Prohibits a number of lending practices that are commonly associated with "predatory lending," including the payment of “yield spread premiums” that lenders pay to brokers, and pre-payment penalties.  (Section 1403) 
  • Establishes Penalties for Lending Violations.  Significantly increases penalties for lenders and mortgage brokers that violate new standards.  Also expands the statute of limitations for certain claims brought under TILA from one year to three years.  (Section 1416) 
  • Expands Consumer Protections for "High-Cost Mortgages." Expands the number of loans subject to the enhanced disclosures and protections required for high-cost loans by lowering the interest rate and the points and fees that trigger those protections.  (Section 1431) 
  • Requires Additional Disclosures. Additional disclosures are required by lenders and servicers, including disclose of the maximum a consumer could pay on a variable rate mortgage, with a warning that payments will vary based on interest rate changes.
  • Housing Counseling: Establishes an Office of Housing Counseling within HUD to boost home ownership and rental housing counseling.  (Section 1441-1445)

The Act also creates the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau, which will have broad rulemaking, enforcement and regulatory authority:

  • Independent Rule Writing.  The Bureau has rule making authority for consumer protections governing all financial institutions — banks and nonbanks — offering consumer financial services or products.
  • Examination and Enforcement. The Bureau has authority to examine and enforce regulations for banks and credit unions with assets of over $10 billion, and all mortgage-related businesses, including lenders, servicers, mortgage brokers, in addition to student lenders and other large non-bank financial companies. Banks and Credit Unions with assets of $10 billion or less will be examined for consumer complaints by their appropriate regulator.
  • Education.   Creates a new Office of Financial Literacy.
  • Consumer Hotline. Creates a national consumer complaint hotline for consumers to  report problems with financial services.
  • Consolidation.  Makes one office accountable for consumer protections over large banks and nonbank financial institutions.

 

House-Senate Committee Complete Negotiations of Financial Reform Legislation

The 2,000 page Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act is ready for its final test:  a full vote by the House and Senate.  The New York Times wrote on Friday (June 25, 2010):

The deal between House and Senate negotiators, sealed just before sunrise on Friday, imposes new rules on some of the riskiest business practices and exotic investment instruments. It also levies hefty fees on the financial services industry, essentially forcing big banks and hedge funds to pay the projected $20 billion, five-year cost of the new oversight that they will face. And it empowers regulators to liquidate failing financial companies, fundamentally altering the balance between government and industry.

The sponsors of the legislation expect that Congress will approve the legislation this week and that President Obama will sign it by the Fourth of July.

The financial reform bill expands the federal government's role in the enforcement and oversight of consumer protection laws and consumer lenders.  The lynchpin of the bill is the creation of a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) with significant regulatory authority.   The CFPB will be part of the Federal Reserve, and led by a director appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate.  Other key elements of the CFPB include: 

  • Examination and enforcement authority.  The CFPB would have authority to examine and enforce regulations for banks and credit unions with assets of over $10 billion and all mortgage-related businesses (lenders, servicers, mortgage brokers, and foreclosure scam operators), payday lenders, and student lenders as well as other large non-bank financial companies, such as debt collectors and consumer reporting agencies. Banks and Credit Unions with assets of $10 billion or less will be examined for consumer complaints by the appropriate regulator. 
  • Consolidation of consumer protection enforcement.  The CFPB would coordinate consumer protection responsibilities currently handled by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Office of Thrift Supervision, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Federal Reserve, National Credit Union Administration, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and Federal Trade Commission.
  • Lending discrimination.  The CFPB would oversee the enforcement of federal laws intended to ensure the fair, equitable and nondiscriminatory access to credit for individuals and communities, including the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act. 
  • Consumer Hotline.  The CFPB would run a national consumer complaint hotline establishing a toll-free number to report problems with financial products and services.
  • Coordination with bank regulations.  The CFPB would coordinate with other regulators when examining banks to prevent undue regulatory burden.

The bill also includes provisions that significantly impact residential mortgage lending, including underwriting considerations and disclosure requirements:

  • Lenders would be required to provide additional disclosures to consumers on mortgages, including disclosure of the maximum a borrower could potentially pay on a variable rate mortgage.
  • Lenders would be required to consider a borrower's "ability to repay" a mortgage during the underwriting process.
  • Lenders could not pay brokers "yield spread premiums" or other financial incentives for certain loan types. 
  • Pre-payment penalty terms would be prohibited.
  • The bill includes enhanced penalties for mortgage lenders and brokers who violate certain consumer protection laws, including penalties up to the equivalent of three-years of interest payments and damages, plus attorney’s fees.
  • The bill expands consumer protections for certain high cost mortgages, going beyond the current requirements in HOEPA.

 

Lawmakers Close to Deal on New Federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

June 23, 2010:  The Los Angeles Times reports that Senate and House negotiators are close to reaching agreement on the creation of a new consumer protection agency as part of the financial services overhaul legislation working its way through Congress and expected to be presented to President Obama for signature within the coming weeks.  According to the report, lawmakers are working out a compromise that would mostly exempt car dealers from the new agency's oversight.  Legislators have reportedly agreed to house the independent agency at the Federal Reserve.

 

Financial Reform Bill May Impact Financial Services Lawyers

The ABA and some state bar associations have asked for changes to the U.S. Senate's version of financial services reform legislation because it contains broad language that may regulate attorneys' practices.  According to a recent ABA Journal article, while the House version of the reform legislation includes a specific exemption for lawyers and their direct employees, the Senate version does not.   The ABA article notes that, under the Senate bill, an attorney who simply holds a trust account may be subject to federal regulator oversight.

On June 15, the House-Senate conference committee will begin negotiating changes to the two bills. The House bill, H.R. 4173 is called the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2009, while the Senate's version (S.3217) is called the Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2010.

U.S. Department of Labor Issues New Opinion: Loan Officers Must Be Paid Overtime

A March 24, 2010, ruling by the U.S. Department of Labor declared that commissioned loan officers are entitled to overtime pay.  The DOL ruling not only addresses the exempt status of loan officers, but also represents a change in the DOL's process for issuing interpretive guidance:  Rather than issuing opinions in response to specific requests, the agency will issue "Administrator's Interpretations" that provide general interpretations of the laws and regulations applicable to all those affected by the provision at issue. 

The March 24 DOL ruling provides that commissioned loan officers do not qualify for the administrative exemption under the Fair Labor Standards Act.  Loan officers who work more than 40 hours per week must be paid for overtime hours at time and a half of their regular rate.  According to the DOL ruling:

 

This Administrator’s Interpretation applies to employees who spend the majority of their time working inside their employer’s place of business, including employees who work in offices located in their homes, rather than mortgage loan officers who are customarily and regularly engaged away from their employer’s place of business. It also applies to employees who do not spend the majority of their time engaging in “cold-calling”, contacting potential customers who have not in some manner expressed an interest in obtaining information about a mortgage loan. However, because many of the duties of all mortgage loan officers are similar, cases arising in these other contexts are referred to for guidance and cited in this interpretation.

 

The Washington Labor & Employment Wire reported that the DOL's loan officer ruling also  withdrew a 2006 DOL opinion letter that misinterpreted 29 C.F.R. §541.203(b) by inaccurately applying an alternative standard for the administrative exemption applied to the financial services industry.

Employers who violate the Fair Labor Standards Act may be liable for two times back pay plus attorney’s fees, and triple damages in the case of willful violations.  The new DOL ruling may trigger a host of class action lawsuit brought by loan officers who were presumed to be exempt and not entitled to overtime under the FL SA.

 

 

Financial Services Bulletin: Despite Heavy Snowfall, Financial Reform Moving Forward

Despite bad weather, Congress appears to be moving forward with financial services reform.  On Tuesday, February 9, House Financial Services Committee Chairman, Barney Frank issued a statement regarding the financial industry and the need for increased consumer protection in the U.S. financial industry.  A comprehensive update and Chairman Frank's statement is available at Perkins Coie's Update Page.

 

New Legislation Attempts to Increase Financial Services Regulation

On Wednesday, December 2, 2009, the House of Representatives Financial Services Committee passed two significant acts, the Financial Stability Improvement Act and the Federal Insurance Office Act, both of which are aimed at increasing federal regulation over the financial services industry.  Both bills have been referred to the full House for consideration.  

A brief summary of the legislation is at the following link: . http://www.perkinscoie.com/news/pubs_detail.aspx?publication=2411&op=updates
 

Financial Services Bulletin: Financial Reform Bills

With the recent flurry of legislative activity focused on reform of the regulatory framework for financial institutions and the financial markets, the Perkins Coie Financial Services Practice is pleased to bring you the Financial Services Bulletin.  This bulletin highlights recent legislative activity impacting financial services and financial institutions.  We plan to publish future bulletins as new legal developments are announced.  The Bulletin is available at the following link:  www.perkinscoie.com/news/pubs_detail.aspx .

Senator Dodd proposes more dramatic financial services reform

Sen. Dodd rolled out his vision of consumer financial services regulatory reform this week and, among other things, it threatens to further consolidate oversight of banks into a single federal agency.
 

Continue Reading...

House Votes to Speed Up Credit CARD Act

Maloney-Frank bill will implement credit card reforms immediately upon enactment

Continue Reading...

Creation of Consumer Financial Protection Agency One Step Closer with House Financial Services Committee Vote

In a 39-29 vote, on October 22, 2009 the House Financial Services Committee approved legislation (H.R. 3126) establishing an independent federal agency charged with overseeing financial products and services. Under the legislation, the Consumer Financial Protection Agency (CFPA) would be an independent agency headed by a Presidentially-appointed and Congressionally-approved Director appointed to a five year term.  The CFPA's responsibilities would include rulemaking, examination and enforcement of financial institutions that provide consumers with financial products and services.  The rulemaking authority of the Federal Reserve Board and other Federal banking regulator agencies under current consumer banking laws would transfer to the CFPA.

A press release from Committee Chairman Barney Frank states that, in addition to having enforcement and broad examination powers, "the agency will closely monitor the marketplace for any new financial products or services that could potentially harm consumers as well as the larger economy. Once the agency identifies these threats or abuses, it will have the power to write rules that can regulate, restrict or ban them. It will also have the power to establish guidelines so that companies issue clear and fair disclosures to customers on products such as credit cards and mortgages. "

The proposed CFPA includes an Office of Fair Lending and Equal Opportunity responsible for enforcement of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA), the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA), and coordinating with other federal agencies regarding fair lending matters.

The Committee vote is only the first step in what is likely to be a long process towards the creation of a new consumer financial services oversight agency.  Many issues remain, including exemptions for small banks, the remaining scope of the Federal Reserve Board's authority, enforcement powers, and preemption.  The CFPA also faces strong opposition from many corners, including from the American Bankers Association.

Fed Proposes Major TILA Changes for Mortgages and Home Equity Lines

The Federal Reserve Board on Thursday proposed significant changes to Regulation Z (Truth in Lending) intended to improve the disclosures consumers receive in connection with closed-end mortgages and home-equity lines of credit (HELOCs). These changes, offered for public comment, reflect the result of consumer testing conducted as part of the Board's comprehensive review of the rules for home-secured credit. The amendments would also provide new consumer protections for all home-secured credit.

Press Release with links to proposal: http://tiny.cc/TenbM

New Federal Consumer Protection Agency on Hold

On July 21, 2009, House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank said that he will postpone a previously planned vote on legislation to create a new federal consumer protection agency until after the August recess.  The new agency  was included in the Obama administration's June 2009 proposal to overhaul the financial sector as an oversight body charged with protecting consumers of mortgages, credit cards and other financial products.  The Washington Post has reported praise for the proposed new agency from consumer protection groups, and sharp criticism from several industry groups, who argue that that the proposed agency will cause increase costs for consumers and further exacerbate the patchwork nature of current financial sector regulation.

Obama Administration Releases Proposed Financial Regulation Reforms

Today, the Obama administration unveiled its proposal for financial regulatory reform. The five policy objectives outlined in the proposal include: 1) promoting supervision and regulation of financial firms, 2) establishing supervision and regulation of financial markets, 3) increasing protections for financial consumers, 4) improving tools for managing financial crises, and 5) establishing international regulatory standards and stepping-up international cooperation. The plan’s major proposals are discussed below:

1. Supervision and Regulation of Financial Firms

The administration proposes the creation of a new Financial Services Oversight Council, which would identify emerging systemic risks and push for interagency cooperation. The plan would also give the Federal Reserve broad supervisory powers over businesses that it believes could pose a threat to financial stability. Further, administrative changes include: creating a new national Bank Supervisor to supervise all federal chartered banks, dismantling the federal thrift charter and certain loopholes that allow some depository institutions to avoid bank holding company regulations, and requiring advisors of all hedge funds to register with the SEC. The plan also suggests more stringent capital and prudential standards for all financial firms, especially larger, interrelated firms.

 

2. Regulation of Financial Markets

The administration recommends enhanced regulation of securitization markets, including new requirements for market transparency, tighter regulation of credit rating agencies, and a mandate that issuers and originators retain a financial interest in securitized loans. The plan also proposes comprehensive regulation of all OTC derivatives.  The administration again pushes to expand the authority of the Federal Reserve, suggesting the Fed oversee payment, clearing, and settlement systems for the financial market.

 

3. Consumers and Investor Protections

The administration proposal creates a new Consumer Financial Protection Agency, charged with overseeing consumer protection in credit, savings, and payments markets. In addition, the plan calls for tighter regulations for all providers of consumer financial products and services, including those provided separately from banking.

 

4. Tools for Managing Crises

The administration requests revisions to the Federal Reserve's emergency lending authority to manage and/or prevent crises in the financial sector, including malfunctions in those non-bank financial institutions whose collapse could cause systemic consequences. 

 

5. International Regulatory Standards and International Cooperation

Finally, the administration proposes that international regulatory standards be tightened to support domestic efforts and oversee global financial markets, while coordinating supervision of internationally active firms.

 

In sum, the administration is proposing a significant restructuring of the regulatory system, creating several new agencies or agency powers including: a Financial Services Oversight Council, the Consumer Financial Protection Agency, the National Bank Supervisor, the Office of National Insurance within Treasury to achieve national coordination in the insurance sector, and increasing the powers of the Federal Reserve. This restructuring is likely to spur a heated debate in Congress, centering on the benefits and detriments of governmental regulation of the financial sector.

 

(Special thanks to Suleen Lee and Kathleen Stetsko for their contributions to this post.)

Obama Administration to Propose Sweeping Financial Oversight Regs

On Wednesday, the Obama administration is expected to unveil a long-anticipated revamp of federal financial sector regulations. It is anticipated that the plan will call for sweeping changes to the oversight of financial markets, empowerment of federal regulators, and limits on the amount of risk that can be extended by financial companies. The proposed changes would also enable the government to boost consumer protections and push for changes in loan securitization. Through this plan, the administration hopes to prevent future crises and to increase oversight of the biggest financial players, whose collapse would severely threaten other institutions and the economy.

While the plan has scaled back from its initial aim to consolidate various regulatory agencies, the proposal includes creating a council of regulators with broader coordinating responsibility across financial systems. After its unveiling, the administration's proposal will be debated in Congressional hearings on Thursday.

(Special thanks to Suleen Lee and Kathleen Stetsko for their contributions to this post. )

Obama Signs Bill to Combat Mortgage and Financial Fraud, Creates Commission

In the wake of the subprime crisis and mortgage meltdown, on May 20, 2009, President Obama signed The Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act ("FERA").  Among other provisions, the new law provides federal law enforcement with additional resources to combat mortgage and financial fraud, and authorizes federal prosecutors to prosecute anyone who fraudulently obtains funds under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act or Troubled Asset Relief Program. 

The law also creates a "9/11"-style commission comprised of outside experts with authorty to review the causes of the economic crisis and recommend changes. The "Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission" will have subpoena power to bring in individuals for investigation and questioning.  FERA grants the Commission authority to refer evidence of wrongdoing to the U.S. attorney general and state attorneys general.

Further information about FERA is available in an article ("Obama Signs Fraud Enforcement and Recover Act in Effort to Combat Mortgage and Financial Fraud") published by Perkins Coie attorney Joel Levin.

 

 

SEC Proposes New Audit Requirements for Investment Advisors

The Securities Exchange Commission has proposed new rules to increase the oversight of investment advisors who retain custody of client assets. The proposed measures come in the wake of what many have termed as a lack of SEC regulation and enforcement that enabled ponzi schemes and other investment fraud to thrive in recent years.

The SEC’s newly proposed regulations include yearly “surprise” audits performed by independent public accountants in order to verify the sanctity of client assets under an investment advisor’s custody. Advisers would be required to disclose the identity of the independent public accountant that performs its surprise audit in public SEC filings, and amend these filings to reflect changes in accountants.  In addition, when an adviser or an affiliate directly holds client assets, a custody control review would have to be conducted by a PCAOB-registered and inspected accountant.

 

The proposed amendments would further require all other custodians holding client assets to directly deliver custodial statements directly to the clients, rather than through investment advisers.  These additional safeguards are meant to deter advisers from preparing false account statements, and increase the likelihood that clients discover any discrepancies between the custodial statements and statements from their investment advisors.

 

The public comment period on these proposed rule amendments will be open for 60 days after their publication in the Federal Register. The full text of the proposed rule amendments have yet to be published.

House Approves Mortgage Fraud Bill

 

On May 6, the House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly to pass, with amendments, a Senate bill to improve enforcement of securities fraud, financial institutions fraud and mortgage fraud.  The bill also addresses fraud related to federal assistance and relief programs.  According to a summary of the bill posted on the CCH Financial Crisis News Center, the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009 ("FERA")  expands the scope of securities fraud provisions and extends the prohibition against defrauding the federal government to the TARP program and to the stimulus bill.  Among other elements of the bill, FERA implements significant improvements to fraud and money laundering statutes to strengthen the government's ability to combat the increase in fraud activities within the financial services sector.

A key element of the bill is an expanded budget for the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate and prosecute financial fraud.  Specifically, the bill authorizes appropriations to the Attorney General for FY2010-FY2011 for investigations, prosecutions, and civil and administrative proceedings involving federal assistance programs and financial institutions.  The bill requires that the DOJ use an appropriate percentage of such funds to investigate mortgage fraud.  Similar additional appropriations are authorized for the U.S. Postal Service, the Inspector General for the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the U.S. Secret Service, and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC):
 

The bill also proposes the creation of a "9/11" style commission called the "Financial Markets Inquiry Commission," which would undertake a bipartisan examination of the mortgage crises and other issues that led to the current financial crisis.  Senate co-sponsors of the amendment to create the Commission, Senators Johnny Isakson (R-GA) and Kent Conrad (D-ND), issued a release stating that “the only way to get an objective evaluation of where mistakes were made is to create an independent commission of experts to ask what went right, what went wrong and what could we have done to prevent this. We need a forensic audit of the laws of the United States as it relates to the financial markets and our economy.”

The bill now returns to the Senate, where the Senate can agree to the House amendments or ask for a conference to compromise on the differences in the two bills.   Assuming agreement, the bill will move to the president for consideration.