The Financial Reform Act: New Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection Is Established with Broad Rulemaking, Enforcement and Regulatory Authority

On June 30, 2010, the House of Representatives approved the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, or the Financial Reform Act, a comprehensive and expansive set of financial reforms widely thought to be the toughest changes to financial regulation in the United States since the Great Depression.  The Senate approved the Financial Reform Act on July 15, 2010 and President Obama signed it into law on July 21, 2010.  Among the key provisions of the Financial Reform Act is the creation of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, which will have authority over a wide range of participants in the consumer finance industry.  This Update highlights the salient features of the Financial Reform Act as it relates to the consumer finance industry.

Read more about the Bureau, including its rulemaking and enforcement authority, at the Perkins Coie News page:  http://www.perkinscoie.com/news/pubs_detail.aspx?op=updates&publication=2709

Financial Reform Bill Includes Provision Addressing Insurance Redlining

Although garnering relatively little attention to date, included in the Dodd-Frank Financial Reform bill is a provision (Section 502) creating the "Federal Insurance Office" (FIO).  The FIO is charged with, among other things, "monitor[ing] the extent to which traditionally underserved communities and consumers, minorities, and low- and moderate-income persons have access to affordable insurance products regarding all lines of insurance..."  The FIO has authority to "receive and collect data and information on and from the insurance industry and insurers" and to "analyze and disseminate data and information."  This data review component offers federal regulators an opportunity to analyze the information for potential insurance redlining similar to agency review of Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) data for lending discrimination.  Federal agencies (and class action plaintiffs' attorneys) have for many years  used HMDA to support investigations and lawsuits against lenders.  The creation of the FIO and the data review process may lead to similar results.

As professor Gregory D. Squires recently wrote in comparing the FIO's data review function to banking agency review of HMDA: 

This is the time for the federal government to finally collect from the insurance industry the kind of information it has long collected from mortgage lenders under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA). For more than three decades the Feds have collected information on the number and types of home loans most mortgage lenders have made in the nation's metropolitan areas along with the census tract or neighborhood in which the homes were located. HMDA has been modified so now lenders are required to disclose the race, gender, and income of all applicants, whether their application was approved or denied, and for certain high cost loans the interest rate on those loans.
 

 

TARP Inspector General Report Touts Mortgage Fraud Investigations

CNNMoney.com reports that the July 21, 2010 quarterly report issued by the Office of the Special Inspector General for TARP (SIGTARP) highlights that office's efforts to prosecute mortgage fraud.  The report touts SIGTARP's investigative unit, which Special Inspector General Neil Barofsky said in his report has turned into a "sophisticated white collar investigative agency."  The report also highlights the government's June 2010 bust of a billion-dollar mortgage fraud ring that led to the arrest of the former chief of wholesale mortgage lender Taylor Bean & Whitaker on charges he "operated a sophisticated shell game" that sought to prop up his failing enterprise at the expense of investors and taxpayers.  Through June, Barofsky's agency was pursuing 104 criminal and civil investigations. 

SIGTARP was established by the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008.  Under that Act,  the Special Inspector General has the responsibility, among other things, to conduct, supervise and coordinate audits and investigations of the purchase, management and sale of assets under TARP.

President Signs Financial Reform Bill Including Increased Consumer Protections

On July 15, 2010 the U.S. Senate passed, and on July 21 the President signed, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.  Included in the new legislation are a number of provisions that will impact consumer lenders, and in particular, residential mortgage lenders:

  • Lenders Must Ensure a Borrower’s Ability to Repay.  Establishes federal minimum underwriting standards for mortgages, including a requirement that lenders consider borrowers ability to repay. (Section 1411) 
  • Prohibits Unfair Lending Practices.  Prohibits a number of lending practices that are commonly associated with "predatory lending," including the payment of “yield spread premiums” that lenders pay to brokers, and pre-payment penalties.  (Section 1403) 
  • Establishes Penalties for Lending Violations.  Significantly increases penalties for lenders and mortgage brokers that violate new standards.  Also expands the statute of limitations for certain claims brought under TILA from one year to three years.  (Section 1416) 
  • Expands Consumer Protections for "High-Cost Mortgages." Expands the number of loans subject to the enhanced disclosures and protections required for high-cost loans by lowering the interest rate and the points and fees that trigger those protections.  (Section 1431) 
  • Requires Additional Disclosures. Additional disclosures are required by lenders and servicers, including disclose of the maximum a consumer could pay on a variable rate mortgage, with a warning that payments will vary based on interest rate changes.
  • Housing Counseling: Establishes an Office of Housing Counseling within HUD to boost home ownership and rental housing counseling.  (Section 1441-1445)

The Act also creates the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau, which will have broad rulemaking, enforcement and regulatory authority:

  • Independent Rule Writing.  The Bureau has rule making authority for consumer protections governing all financial institutions — banks and nonbanks — offering consumer financial services or products.
  • Examination and Enforcement. The Bureau has authority to examine and enforce regulations for banks and credit unions with assets of over $10 billion, and all mortgage-related businesses, including lenders, servicers, mortgage brokers, in addition to student lenders and other large non-bank financial companies. Banks and Credit Unions with assets of $10 billion or less will be examined for consumer complaints by their appropriate regulator.
  • Education.   Creates a new Office of Financial Literacy.
  • Consumer Hotline. Creates a national consumer complaint hotline for consumers to  report problems with financial services.
  • Consolidation.  Makes one office accountable for consumer protections over large banks and nonbank financial institutions.

 

Illinois AG Sues Countrywide, Alleges Lending Discrimination

The Associated Press reports that Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan has sued Countrywide Home Loans, alleging the company discriminated against African American and Latino borrowers in Illinois between 2005 and 2007.  The complaint includes allegations that Countrywide charged African American and Latino borrowers higher rates and fees compared to similarly situated white borrowers.   The complaint states that Countrywide engaged "in practices that resulted in a disparate impact and disparate treatment of African American and Latino borrowers.  The complaint also alleges that Countrywide utilized lending standards that had no economic basis and were discriminatory in effect..."

While the complaint includes allegations not unfamiliar in lending discrimination cases, it may spark important legal analysis regarding the use of the disparate impact theory as the sole basis to provide lending discrimination.  See prior posting  - "AAG Perez Reiterates DOJ's Emphasis on Lending Discrimination Enforcement," June 24, 2010.

 

House-Senate Committee Complete Negotiations of Financial Reform Legislation

The 2,000 page Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act is ready for its final test:  a full vote by the House and Senate.  The New York Times wrote on Friday (June 25, 2010):

The deal between House and Senate negotiators, sealed just before sunrise on Friday, imposes new rules on some of the riskiest business practices and exotic investment instruments. It also levies hefty fees on the financial services industry, essentially forcing big banks and hedge funds to pay the projected $20 billion, five-year cost of the new oversight that they will face. And it empowers regulators to liquidate failing financial companies, fundamentally altering the balance between government and industry.

The sponsors of the legislation expect that Congress will approve the legislation this week and that President Obama will sign it by the Fourth of July.

The financial reform bill expands the federal government's role in the enforcement and oversight of consumer protection laws and consumer lenders.  The lynchpin of the bill is the creation of a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) with significant regulatory authority.   The CFPB will be part of the Federal Reserve, and led by a director appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate.  Other key elements of the CFPB include: 

  • Examination and enforcement authority.  The CFPB would have authority to examine and enforce regulations for banks and credit unions with assets of over $10 billion and all mortgage-related businesses (lenders, servicers, mortgage brokers, and foreclosure scam operators), payday lenders, and student lenders as well as other large non-bank financial companies, such as debt collectors and consumer reporting agencies. Banks and Credit Unions with assets of $10 billion or less will be examined for consumer complaints by the appropriate regulator. 
  • Consolidation of consumer protection enforcement.  The CFPB would coordinate consumer protection responsibilities currently handled by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Office of Thrift Supervision, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Federal Reserve, National Credit Union Administration, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and Federal Trade Commission.
  • Lending discrimination.  The CFPB would oversee the enforcement of federal laws intended to ensure the fair, equitable and nondiscriminatory access to credit for individuals and communities, including the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act. 
  • Consumer Hotline.  The CFPB would run a national consumer complaint hotline establishing a toll-free number to report problems with financial products and services.
  • Coordination with bank regulations.  The CFPB would coordinate with other regulators when examining banks to prevent undue regulatory burden.

The bill also includes provisions that significantly impact residential mortgage lending, including underwriting considerations and disclosure requirements:

  • Lenders would be required to provide additional disclosures to consumers on mortgages, including disclosure of the maximum a borrower could potentially pay on a variable rate mortgage.
  • Lenders would be required to consider a borrower's "ability to repay" a mortgage during the underwriting process.
  • Lenders could not pay brokers "yield spread premiums" or other financial incentives for certain loan types. 
  • Pre-payment penalty terms would be prohibited.
  • The bill includes enhanced penalties for mortgage lenders and brokers who violate certain consumer protection laws, including penalties up to the equivalent of three-years of interest payments and damages, plus attorney’s fees.
  • The bill expands consumer protections for certain high cost mortgages, going beyond the current requirements in HOEPA.

 

Morgan Stanley Pays $102mm to Settle Mass. Probe Related to New Century Lending Practices

June 24, 2010 - Marketwatch.com reports that Morgan Stanley & Co. agreed to pay $102 million to  settle allegations that it aided and abetted subprime lender New Century Financial Corp. in taking advantage of consumers.  Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley's office announced the settlement on Thursday.  According to its press release, the AG "alleged that Morgan entered the subprime arena in Massachusetts by offering funding to retail lenders that specialized in loans to less-qualified borrowers. Morgan provided billions of dollars to subprime lender New Century, which used Morgan funds to target lower-income borrowers and lure them into loans that consumers predictably could not afford to pay...Some Morgan Stanley investment bankers referred to New Century as Morgan’s 'partner' in the subprime lending business."

AAG Perez Reiterates DOJ's Emphasis on Lending Discrimination Enforcement

Speaking at a June 23, 2010 Brookings conference, the Department of Justice's Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division made clear that investigating and prosecuting lending discrimination is a top priority for his administration.  As reported on mainjustice.com, AAG Thomas Perez reaffirmed the DOJ's commitment to increased oversight and enforcement of the financial industry, as well as close interaction among the federal regulators that police the financial systems.

Mr. Perez also reiterated that his division will use the "disparate impact" theory to file lending discrimination case.  “The government must be a credible deterrent,” he said. “Our Fair Lending Unit will use every tool in our arsenal, including but not limited to disparate impact theory.”  Perez made similar remarks at the May 2010 Legal Issues Conference of the Mortgage Banker's Association.  The disparate impact theory, as articulated in U.S. Supreme Court's 1971 decision Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971), allows a plaintiff to challenge a facially neutral practice that has an unjustified adverse impact on members of a protected class; evidence of an intent to discriminate is not required.  The DOJ's reliance on the disparate impact theory as the sole basis to file a lending discrimination case signals a marked departure from its prior lending discrimination cases, none of which relied exclusively on disparate impact.  The department's aggressive approach will undoubtedly lead to a significant increase in enforcement cases and litigation in this area.  And lenders anticipating this change in enforcement are wise to adapt their compliance program accordingly. 

Lawmakers Close to Deal on New Federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

June 23, 2010:  The Los Angeles Times reports that Senate and House negotiators are close to reaching agreement on the creation of a new consumer protection agency as part of the financial services overhaul legislation working its way through Congress and expected to be presented to President Obama for signature within the coming weeks.  According to the report, lawmakers are working out a compromise that would mostly exempt car dealers from the new agency's oversight.  Legislators have reportedly agreed to house the independent agency at the Federal Reserve.

 

SEC, Federal Indictment Accuse Former Taylor Bean & Whitaker Exec of Fraud

June 16, 2010.  The former chief executive of Taylor Bean & Whitaker has been indicted with orchestrating a massive equity and MBS fraud scheme tied to TBW's borrowings from Colonial Bank, a depository it tried to take control of last summer using TARP money.   The indictment alleges that Lee Bentley Farkas and co-conspirators "tried to steal $553 million" through the TARP program. According to court documents, Farkas also personally misappropriated more than $20 million from TWB and Colonial Bank. 

Read more: Orlando Business Journal

The Securities and Exchange Commission filed a related case against Farkas alleging that he sold more than $1.5 billion in fabricated or impaired mortgage loans and securities to Colonial Bank. The SEC’s complaint charges Farkas with violations of the antifraud, reporting, books and records and internal controls provisions of federal securities laws.

According the SEC's statement, through Taylor Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp. Farkas sold more than $1.5 billion worth of fabricated or impaired mortgage loans and securities to Colonial Bank.

Those loans and securities were falsely reported to the investing public as high-quality, liquid assets.  Farkas also was responsible for a bogus equity investment that caused Colonial Bank to misrepresent that it had satisfied a prerequisite necessary to qualify for TARP funds. When Colonial Bank's parent company — Colonial BancGroup, Inc. — issued a press release announcing it had obtained preliminary approval to receive $550 million in TARP funds, its stock price jumped 54 percent in the remaining two hours of trading, representing its largest one-day price increase since 1983.

 Read more:  Businessweek.com (Former Taylor Bean Chief Farkas Charged With Fraud)

Tags: , ,